score:
1

Do municipality regulations affect you?

I may have to quit Rover because I found out the city I live in has ordinances dealing with pet boarding and kennels.

The Code Enforcement officer said they generally only enforce Codes if they get a complaint. My neighbor behind me is using the fact that he could report me as leverage to pile all his yard waste right on my fence line behind his bushes. He can't see it but it's an eyesore for my backyard. And no, I cannot afford a privacy fence. I tried talking to him about it and he said "It's my compost pile, besides you can't report me because your doggie day care is illegal." This isn't the first time he's been a jerk.

Anyway, after doing some research it appears that as long as I take only 2 dogs at a time there is enough ambiguity in the Zoning Ordinance that it would be possible for me to argue my case if I was ever cited. However... it also means my neighbor is going to have me over a barrel.

I am SO frustrated. Did the rest of you research your local laws about doing dog boarding? The more I think about this I'm actually not surprised that there are Codes against this kind of home-based business.

Comments

I researched & to my knowledge I am doing everything I should but my neighbors son hates me (Because I'm not Republican) he's hurled racist remarks, scares my kids, just making life difficult by complaining meanwhile HIS dog barks all night long! Now I have to answer to these complaints. Smh

3 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
score:
1

The more I think about this I'm actually not surprised that there are Codes against this kind of home-based business.

I agree with that. There's always a few people who ruin it for everyone else.

Where I live we have a leash law. I've been amazed that 1/3 of the dogs I've booked are brought (and taken away) without a leash. I've even had two people remove the leash (as they pickup their dog), dismissively saying "we don't need that."

I can think of a dozen neighbors who will (a matter of when, not if) encounter a strange dog off leash and place a call to the city to "find out what can be done about this guy operating a kennel out of his home."

It is remarkable to me that I'm actually going to have to say (upon initial contact with potential clients) that I require the use of a leash. To me, that's so fundamental, I feel like I would offend people by saying it.

But, to your point, that's how these laws came about. Where I live, I can keep 4 dogs without being a "kennel" (as defined by law). Legislators didn't come up with that definition to amuse themselves. Some guy was keeping 10 dogs and not picking up poo, neighbors complained. So, legislators chose a number (affecting the poor guy who could keep 5 dogs without any problem).

Likewise, leashes are required because someone thought "we don't need that" -- and it turned out badly.

The way it's going, it's just a matter of time until city officials hear a complaint related to activity at my address. After 5-6 of those happening around the city, maybe a couple actual bites... suddenly it's in the news how "Rover is circumventing kennel laws. We have to do something about this."

I wish Rover would be a little more proactive. Like, maybe more required questions to dog owners when creating their profile? Maybe an assessment (survey questionnaire) to categorize a dog's owner's traits.

We (sitters) are encouraged to take Rover 101 in order to demonstrate at least an understanding of how to be be a responsible sitter (and use Rover effectively). I think owners should have a similar badge. (Because, I really shouldn't have to tell people, "you need to use a leash. You're going to wreck it for everyone else.").

Maybe I'm making too much of this. But, its this kind of stuff that becomes a problem for these disruptive "2.0" trends. (Uber, Airbnb, et al.). I'm sure Rover wants to maximize bookings instead of making it difficult. But, I can see it already. It's just a matter of time.

Comments

Did you edit your answer? I could have sworn I saw something in there that said ".. what about the children?" It gave me a good chuckle.

I've had several (really more) clients show up to meet and greets at my home without a leash. I always tell them that leashes are legally required, and I won't introduce my dogs to theirs unless it's on a leash. It really is ridiculous that we have to tell pet owners such basic stuff.

@jill, yes. I thought it could imply the complainers don't have a legitimate concern. It might sound like I am belittling them. But, yes, you know how these things take on a pitch-fork mob tone. Instead of creative solutions to weed out bad apples, "ban it!"

@Shane, I don't understand why things like you describe aren't basic (101 badge-worthy) orientation. It would help sitters and owners speak a common language, be "on the same page." We could decline requests from those who haven't taken the time to earn the badge. That seems so much more orderly.

I like the idea of owners earning badges too! It would really make the process so much better.

score:
2

I did research my city and county laws before starting to work for Rover, and I think all potential Rover sitters should do the same PRIOR TO signing up for Rover. Each city, county, and state is different, but I'm sure almost all have some sort of laws regarding keeping animals in the home for pay. Plano, Texas, (outside Dallas) and Collin County have ordinances that govern animal facility/kennels. You are required to get a kennel license if you care for a minimum of 5 animals in your home. Since I only board one dog or dog family, I'm good to go. Most of my neighbors own dogs so they are cool when they see my clients come and go, thankfully.

score:
0

I wouldn't let him blackmail. What's next? I can come in your house and take your stuff and you're not allowed to say anything because "I'll tell"?! Take away his power!!! Also just because you may or may not be illegal doesn't give him to the right to break the law too.

If need be you can still offer the other 3 services: home boarding at owner house, drop in, walking.