score:
2

How does Rover justify its 20% on the sitters income?

Rover needs to cap their fees at $200 a month, that would be based on $1000 bookings. And this is ALOT! Rover's services are automated. We seldom talk to a real person. As we increase business, Rover's services do NOT increase. Rover what do you do to deserve more than this? I have booked $4000/MOS in repeat biz. Why do you deserve $800? Why would I pay $800 month for automated services? And I learned you are charging the owners too? I cannot think of another company/service that charges this HIGH AMOUNT IN ANY WAY, be it financial advisors, insurance premiums, subscriptions to a variety of services, memberships..... And these other companies provide so much more value! Can you help me market more? Do mass mailings? Give me Freebees? Provide promotional materials? Pay the deductibles on your "medical" insurance? Give me some ideas, take aways of justifying the value of charging so much? I would think you would DECREASE your fees if the volume of services INCREASE. Quantity Discounts, Price Breaks, you know like MOST businesses do to reward their customers. We/the sitters are your customers!

Comments

Wow - over $4000 booked at $45 night (your boarding rate)=88 booked nights/ month. Way to stay busy, Pat. Kudos!

Yes, this is correct Deb :-}

I am getting referrals on top of this from my existing clients. Referrals NOT through Rover although I am putting through Rover do to the mass number of clients in a short period of time. Rover is only providing automated back office at this point in time. Rover does NOT provide sitting services,

I take up to 4 dogs at a time for an estimated 22 nights. My success is through word-of-mouth referrals. Rover could make more money by attracting more dog sitters capping the fees. Dog sitters can only take on so many dogs. Lots of biz to go around. I turn dogs away.

Sitters are not protected. I've had property destroyed, clients slander me, and when I contact Rover they go into the we're not liable spiel. If anything goes wrong, I'm legally liable. I've been bitten, and Rover refused to address it, while demanding I address a customer complaint. Shady....

Pat: That add’l info helps. I suspected that the 88 dog nightly bookings did not all come through Rover & learned of your services from word of mouth. For those who do not come through Rover, it may be worth it to not convert them to Rover clients and book them yourself. I do for some walks visits

Advertising. Rover is saving all of us a ton of money in advertising. Pairing up with Rover saved my pet care business. But enough word of mouth connections might be worth looking at the suggestions in some of the other answers and comments for you - depends on client turnover rates.

Completely agres. The 20% should be capped as they provide nothing additionally. l am very tired of their poor customer service and disfunctional app.

@Mallory M. I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks the app is dysfunctional, from the issues it caused I almost lost my 1st client. Also yeah there’s no reason the fees should continue at the same rate for the limited amount of what they provide.

5 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
score:
5

Rover is ripping us off! Not only do we pay 20% with no cap they are charging the owners exuberant rates also! I’m posting a new question thread to see if anyone wants to band together and boycott this 20%! They are not protecting us as they say and the marketing isn’t worth what they charge us and the clients! Please email me at aprilsistrunk@gmail.com SUBJECT ROVER FEES to discuss how to handle this. I have seen numerous complaints from sitters but zero action from Rover! Do they see these threads? Are they ignoring us? Y’all we have rights and are being ripped off.

Comments

I’m new to Rover and I hve my first booking only to discover they are taking almost $50. I was very shocked! $50?? For what?

score:
1

Rover is a good place to start your own business and rapport to initiate and build a client relationship. Once you have a comfortable relationship, you can provide services off the Rover app, just like how you would anyway with close friends. Some clients prefer to use services through the app since it has more trackability, which is perfectly fine. Communication is key in every relationship so make sure you have a trust in one another before doing anything unofficial.

Comments

You may want to read Rover Terms Of Service again. Any client generated through rover-has to be booked via rover. You & client can’t decide to “provide services off the rover app”, unless you & client want to risk rover accounts permanently closed. That’s why this posted.

score:
1

20 percent is a pretty standard rate for business overhead. The use of the app, sending the Rover cards-instead of you needing to type out Fido peed, pooped, all you need to do is tough that button, walk route is automatically tracked, pictures go onto the app and card without taking up space on your phone and making you have to manage that.

The communications platform, the extra phone number for you and the client that does not involve a personal cell phone number. Using Rover means people have to become a client with a verified booking before they are allowed to review your performance, so they can’t post a bunch BS on Rover telling people how awful you are until a completed booking. Requiring a credit card is not just about payment, it is also how Rover identifies that there is a person attached to the account.

The platform itself that allows people to find you to book your services is a huge benefit. Along with there is some insurance coverage for you and the client.

Rover handles the “Administrivia” so you are not chasing payments, managing all of that minutiae and having people Pick at you about how much it costs during or after the booking. It is all there, the breakdown of costs, they agreed and so did you. Rover helps enforce that agreement.

Comments

I agreed to the fee because I thought I would be protected from out of pocket costs from misrepresentation or other client misconduct. I have not been protected! Actually it has been the exact opposite in my experience.

Lynn: hope it’s fine if add onto your answer... Rover connects sitters with pet owners that you have not met & were not going to meet, because while they live nearby, they’re not your neighbors (people you meet, you can book yourself)

The amount that Rover takes is not appropriate for the services the app provides. The greatest service the app provides is connecting us sitters with new owners, beyond that, taking ONE FIFTH of our pay for any client forces us to charge more in order to make any sort of reasonable income. Not legit

score:
0

For those who might not have waded through the first answer and all the replies - ADVERTISING. Rover is getting its 20% for providing a national advertising platform for small businesses and gig workers in pet care. It is up to you to decide if that's worth the 20%.

Comments

It’s not worth the 20%. They only advertise us well if we keep our booking score high by accepting every client, regardless if it’s a safety or destruction risk. Rover has a very shady business model, and is not geared to think future-like.

I always feel so pressured to keep my sitter-score high, its honestly a burden I wasn’t expecting to have!

score:
-3

Rover as a business continues to lose money and has never turned a profit., last year they lost almost 2 million dollars. What makes you think they will reduce or cap fees? Upset with the fees, take your business independent

Comments

You might find the recent transcript of the earnings call with analysts interesting: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4493581-rover-group-inc-rovr-ceo-aaron-easterly-on-q4-2021-results-earnings-call-transcript

Rover needs to rethink their operations model. Need to increase revenue and lower costs. Rover will get and retain more clients, dog sitters, if cap the fees. Then Rover must reduce costs which is in salaries and workforce costs. Its an automated software system! The business model is lacking.

Walt G., at 83% gross profits. How is Rover losing money? And per you comment if I do not like it I can go elsewhere. Well, small biz owners, the sitters, are contracting with Rover they are NOT employees. It is a free market, still capitalism rules to date. Competition will direct the market.

I’d like to think that what Walt meant was for all your clients that come to you from word of mouth and referral, don’t feel obligated to convert them into rover clients. Find a way to book them so you get to reap the income & keep them separate.

Totally agree with Deb. I sit for several neighbors and have never felt the need to have them book through Rover since they provide hardly anything in return for their cut.