score:
2

Review for sitter cancellation

After numerous sitter candidates indicating they were unavailable (despite their calendars showing they were!), I had finally booked an In-home sitting appointment with a sitter for a very important weekend: my own wedding! 11 Days before the booking, the sitter is cancelling. Given the phrasing of the sitter's reply as "...may have to cancel. Sorry for the short notice", I am frustrated that pet parents have little in the way of reviewing the booked sitter for cancellations. To me, you either need to cancel or you don't. This wishy-washy reply impresses on me that sitters are not truly committed to the service they plan to offer. And http://Rover.com should take issue with this.

If this is a peer reviewed site and sitters rise or fall out by the quality of their service, then I think sitter initiated cancellations should be factored into the review process. I am not happy with the idea of scrambling to find a new sitter, especially from a pool of sitters who seem uncommitted to a service they claim to offer. I have used http://Rover.com twice before: the first being an OK booking; the second one an atrocious disaster. This third booking may have swayed me to stay off this site forever.

Comments

The customer of any service like this should be able to track the reliability of the service provider. Airbnb states, "Cancellations disrupt guests' plans & impact confidence in the Airbnb community." So, theres a $50 fee & an automated review to indicate canceled res. ALSO-customer gets 20$ credit

Sitter cancellations is one of the most important pieces of information when selecting a provider, yet this is withheld. There is absolutely no reason this isn't indicated, other than Rover doesn't want people to turn away from their service.

4 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
score:
0

Hi Nelson,

I am sorry you have had such poor experiences with Rover sitters. I don't know where you are located or anything about the sitter pool available in your area, but in the case of this last, wishy-washy cancellation, you should be calling Rover's Customer Support team to find a replacement and express your dissatisfaction. That kind of irresponsible behavior by one sitter isn't reflective of the vast majority of sitters across the country who do take their commitments seriously as they do care for your pet.

As for the other point in your comments, the fact that the sitter cancelled would be factored into his/her search ranking. Opening up the Review section to actual nonclients would be difficult to manage and unfair to sitters who have decline sitting engagements for valid reasons. As I said, I don't know the sitting pool in your area, but perhaps you should look for a more mature individual with a documented, excellent track record.

Comments

How does opening reviews to clients who were cancelled on be difficult to manage and unfair to sitters?? All it does is increase transparency. Who is this more unfair to, the sitter who cancelled or the client who was cancelled on? Sure, reasons can be valid, so? It still indicates a track record.

Also, the person who just cancelled on still shows on the first page of results, so either you are not credible or the rest of the Rover sitter population is just that much worse, which is actually quite possible based on my experiences.

score:
0

Hi Nelson,

You definitely should give a call to Rover's Customer Support line, I agree that the sitter should commit to whether or not they have to cancel and do so if the stay has been fully booked and executed by both parties. In that case Rover Customer Support would be able to help you find the right course of action and they would make sure you were then set up with a reliable sitter. I do agree with Karen R. in that you seem to have had a few bad luck incidents with sitters but that doesn't mean that all have that mind set. While I am biased since I am a sitter myself, I also came to find this service by being a pup parent needing someone to watch my dog Maverick- and have had amazing experiences on both sides of the Dog sitting. Hopefully this incident won't spoil your outlook on using Rover in the Future.

I can understand the frusteration of contacting sitters that appear available and then have them decline your request, one thing you have to keep in mind is that the summer time is an especially busy time with people going on vacations and needing dog sitting services, so sitters get multiple requests for the same time frames. Until an actual request is booked sitters are shown as available so it could have been a situation where they were already speaking with someone on a request for those dates. Obviously I can't speak directly for those sitters you interacted with, but personally in that case I make sure I let the owner know I am currently going through the Meet and Greet process with another potential client or that I already have a request for those dates but will keep them updated on the outcome.

Something you might want to look into and see if it is available in your area is the Rover Premier service- these are Rover Sitters that do not have a full time position elsewhere (a lot of the Rover Sitters I know use Dog Sitting as a supplement to their full time job) and Rover has fully vetted their applications, visited and approved their house, and will actually help you find a sitter that is right for you. I hope this helps!

Thanks, Meaghan

score:
0

I agree. This is my first time using Rover and my experience so far has been worse than negative. I spent nearly 10 hours already searching and speaking with people already and my impression is that they are just extremely unreliable and treat you as a transaction. I think 90% of "available" sitters actually weren't, and the ones that were always agreed to something that they didn't end up committing to. I felt this way before I finally found someone, who, after speaking with her over a call, booking with her, and feeling relieved to have finally ended this process, cancelled a couple days later. She used a blanket reason and didn't sound sorry at all.

The truth is, Rover could easily add some feature to their site that allows users to review the sitter or indicate cancellations, but they don't because they don't want to lose any potential business and turn customers away. Just think about how unreliable their providers must be that they feel they need to hide this information. You are correct that this is a common sense element of any business but I've realized Rover is no better than other online provider sites that care about their profits and not about best practices and the very users that put money in their pockets. They want to encourage people to book and in the event a sitter initiated booking takes place, they just pass that inconvenience on to the clients. Rover could care less about them.

This also encourage sitters to cancel appointments that are not in their best interest. If they find a better offer, more dogs, or simply would rather go on vacation because they were unable to maximize their earnings, they will just book now, cancel later. Rover claims sitter initiated cancellations impacts their placement in search results, yet the person who just cancelled on me still appears on first page of results. Yikes.

score:
0

I am not suggesting that Reviews are opened to "non-clients" or the public per se. Firstly, I think Rover should make the Sitter explicitly cancel the booking in these situations. The cancellations are tied to actual bookings that were scheduled and agreed upon by members and sitters. When this occurs, a member should be given the opportunity to comment or review the sitter. It can be positive, neutral, or negative; the reason of the cancellation determines how the sitter's rating is affected. Or, skip the review, and show how many cancellations the sitter's made with comments. This gives other members context in deciding whether to book with a sitter or not.

As part of my vetting process for a potential sitter, I take into consideration reviews, references, and in-person interview and interaction with my dog to gauge his/her "maturity". In my case, the sitter had a 5-star rating and by all appearances projected a professional demeanor. My previous sitter also had a 5-star rating, but before pickup, did not respond timely and was locked out of his/her own house for 1+ hours before we could actually take our dog home. A "more mature individual" is not something you can empirically measure.

Comments

I am sorry, the booking was not explicitly cancelled? Had the engagement been confirmed by Rover, i.e., the sitter officially accepted and you paid? The circumstances surrounding the engagement are beginning to appear rather convoluted. I understand your desire to want to inform the world that this sitter let you know and may do this again in the future. However, I would rather Rover's system takes cancellations into account in search rankings than have comments being written when a stay did not take place. The system is, by no means, perfect. Sitters here have commented regularly on the need to see comments written about a dog by another sitter. That is not available. All we can do is lobby Rover to make such vital information available to us. But pat yourself on the back for doing your due diligence. Did you know there is such a thing as... (more)

I am totally with Nelson on this. I do not believe the reviews at http://Rover.com are reflective of the sitter's capability or commitment. I left my puppy for 3 days with a sitter who had 5 ratings and come back to find her with a CUT TONGUE, locked in a crate over the night with another dog (despite me mentioning she is scared to be alone and the sitter agreeing to have her in the bedroom). Shocked, I went back to check the reviews and all are on the same month in of Aug 2014. Curious about the review system, I tried to find sitters with bad ratings to see if there are any? And believe it or not there were none that I could find. I browsed through atleast 7 pages.